TOLbanner

Thu Jul 09, 2009

Talks for global climate change plan between G-8 nations unravel

image

Talks between the G-8 nations concerning climate change failed to come to fruition at the recent yearly G-8 summit meeting. The major global powers and rising nations could not agree on a proposed plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent worldwide by 2050. Industrialized countries would have been required to reduce their emissions by 80 percent.

Global warming was near the top of the G-8’s roster, with disorder in Iran, the international economic meltdown and nuclear proliferation among other top concerns. The failure to reach agreement stemmed from an essential divide between the industrial powers and developing nations. The latter refused to commit to the plan without more substantial cuts on the part of the powers, as well as financial help. Talks were further strained as China’s President Hu Jintao left to contend with the deadly ethnic clashes in his country.

With the US and Europe advocating for stricter emission laws, and developing countries calling for large amounts of economic help to enact their own changes, an agreement, for the time being, appears unlikely. In the US, the House just passed legislation to reduce emissions, but these requirements still do not meet the goals of the G-8 nations.

Weigh in, Opinion Leaders. Do you think a doable climate change plan can be agreed upon? Should the international powers give financial assistance to their developing counterparts in order to help them meet emission requirements? What can and should be done to curb global climate change?

Posted by: KLC on Jul 09, 09 | 2:33 pm | Profile

[357] comments (1860 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Tue Jul 07, 2009

Russian-US Nuclear Deal

image

Following President Obama’s first summit meeting with Russian President Dmitri A. Medvedev, the groundwork of an arms control agreement between the two countries was announced. The agreement, which has the goal of reducing the supply of nuclear weapons held by each country, was only one of the first steps in the most noteworthy attempt at a Russian-US treaty since the cold war ended.

The deal calls for both countries to cut the amount of warheads and weapon transportation vehicles held throughout the next seven years. Both Obama and Medvedev have expressed serious interest in rehabilitating relations between the US and Russia, which had become especially strained during the Bush administration and reached a new level of hostility during Russia’s conflict with Georgia. Obama plans to reinstate military to military contact with Russia, and Russia will allow the US to fly planes through the country’s airspace to deliver troops and supplies to Afghanistan.

Both leaders appear determined to craft a deal that will recast Russian-US relations and redefine the nuclear age, but many stumbling blocks still stand in the way. The negotiation process preceding the preliminary agreement had seemed to waver on several occasions. A planned US missile defense base in Eastern Europe appears to be a major sticking point for Russia. Weigh in, Opinion Leaders. Do you think these first steps to a Russian-US arms control deal will ultimately lead to a successful treaty or improved relations?

Posted by: KLC on Jul 07, 09 | 1:32 pm | Profile

[96] comments (1083 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Thu Jul 02, 2009

The Withdrawal of American Troops from Iraq

image

On Tuesday, Iraqi prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki led public celebrations in honor of the withdrawal of US troops from Iraqi cities and sovereignty from the indefinite US occupation.

Many Iraqis remain cautious, fearing that the Iraqi army is not ready to face the violence and insurgency that the country is rife with, alone. While Maliki makes proud claims of a finally independent Iraq, many doubt that the government and armed forces will be able to stand on their own. 130,000 American troops still remain in Iraq, and attacks are still ongoing, such as a recent suicide bombing in Kirkuk that killed 33, and the death of 4 US soldiers in an attack two days ago.

Violence is only expected to increase during the ongoing troop withdrawal. An inherent bitterness between the US and Iraqi military continues, as Iraq seems only too keen to expel American troops, despite expecting them to still come to the rescue when needed.

What do you think, Opinion Leaders? Is the withdrawal being dealt with correctly? How do you think Iraq will handle the insurgency with its own military? How long do you think a number of American troops will remain in Iraq?

Posted by: KLC on Jul 02, 09 | 12:57 pm | Profile

[130] comments (1275 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Mon Jun 29, 2009

Honduran Military Coup

image

In the first military coup in Latin America since the end of the Cold War, the Honduran military banished President Manuel Zelaya and instated Roberto Micheletti as president. The Obama administration denounced the coup, and its efforts to contact the Honduran military have been rebuffed.

There is growing debate over the legality of the coup. Zelaya, a close ally of the anti-US President Chávez of Venezuela, was embroiled in a battle with Honduran courts and Congress over his planned referendum to ask voters to get rid of the constitution, including the constitutional ban on re-election.

Some maintain that the coup was in service to democracy, overthrowing a president who was seeking to illegally remain in power, and who was seen as an arm of Chávez’s socialist movement. Others see a military coup that removed a popular leader who championed the poor. Weigh in, Opinion Leaders. What is your opinion on the Honduran coup? How do you think the Obama administration should respond? What effects and repercussions do you think this event will have on Latin America in general?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 29, 09 | 1:59 pm | Profile

[161] comments (1126 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Mon Jun 15, 2009

Iran’s Presidential Election

image

In the midst of controversy following the Iranian Presidential elections, large demonstrations held by hundreds of thousands of Iranians took place in midtown Tehran. The protest was largely peaceful except for one demonstration resulting in gunfire that killed one protestor and seriously injured others. Most protestors remained silent throughout the demonstrations. The three opposition candidates attended the protest as well as young and old Iranians dressed in traditional and western clothing.

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei initially declared Sunday President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner, but now has taken an unprecedented step and ordered an investigation into alleged voter fraud. The claims presidential candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi made will be investigated. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who won the election with a landslide two thirds of the votes, has compared the protestors to unhappy fans at a football game.

Many countries have shown concern over the Iranian election. Vice President Joe Biden said on Meet the Press “there’s some real doubt” and “there’s an awful lot of questions about how this election was run.” Other countries voiced similar concerns with both France and Germany issuing questions to their Iranian Ambassador about the fairness of the vote.

Opinion leaders weigh in…has this election been rigged with voter fraud? Do candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi and the Iranian protestors have legitimate claims? Will this protest make a difference within the Iranian government? Is supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei really questioning the result or is he just trying to appease the issue?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 15, 09 | 6:17 pm | Profile

[557] comments (2373 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Wed Jun 10, 2009

Elections in Lebanon

image

On Sunday, American-backed parties won in Lebanon’s parliamentary elections, taking 71 seats to the 57 won by Hezbollah and other parties backed by Syria and Iran. This upset seems to signal a moderating influence in the Middle East, that many attribute to President Obama’s policy actions and recent speech in Cairo.

One election cannot be cited as evidence of sweeping and dramatic change, and the moderate parties do not have such a majority that they can govern alone, but the victory was a pleasing surprise for the US and its allies.

Iran’s upcoming presidential election spells another opportunity for the triumph of moderates in the Middle East. Anti-American President Ahmadinejad has recently been losing appeal amongst his constituents, while Mir Hussein Moussavi, his moderate opposition, has been gaining force.

What do you think, Opinion Leaders? Will the success of an American-aligned coalition in Lebanon bring any real change, either to Lebanon or the Middle East in general? How do you think the Iranian presidential election will turn out, and what implications will it have for the US?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 10, 09 | 9:27 am | Profile

[152] comments (1364 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Mon Jun 08, 2009

Don't Ask - Don't Tell

image

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent decision to deny an appeal by former Army Capt. James Pietrangelo II, who was discharged from the military under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, the fight for openly gay service in the military has come under increased scrutiny.

The court upheld “don’t ask, don’t tell,” a compromise formulated during the Clinton years, asking the Obama administration to continue compliance with the directive. Obama had expressed a desire to end the policy, which calls for the dismissal of anyone serving in the military that establishes themselves as openly gay or seeks to marry someone of the same sex. However, Obama has made no concrete move to stop “don’t ask, don’t tell,” and has not challenged the dismissal of armed service members under the policy.

The appeals court ruled that “don’t ask, don’t tell” was “rationally related to the government’s legitimate interest in military discipline and cohesion.”

Weigh in, Opinion Leaders. Do you think the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is a justifiable practice? Do you think such a policy is integral to the military’s organization? What do you think about recent rulings on the matter?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 08, 09 | 6:55 pm | Profile

[48] comments (1041 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Thu Jun 04, 2009

President Obama Visits Saudi Arabia

image

President Obama arrived in Saudi Arabia yesterday to kick off his much anticipated tour of the Middle East with the purpose of ameliorating relations between the US and the region. President Obama gave a speech in Cairo addressing the Muslim world.

The main goal of Obama’s trip will be to nudge the Arab nations towards offering a concession to Israel in order to convince them to hasten the peace process. Experts predict that this plan will be met with a rebuff from Arab leaders, who feel that they have already offered large concessions to Israel, and that a gesture must be returned before there is any hope to continue the peace process.

The US’s image in the Middle East has already seen improvement since Obama entered office, but is clearly still tenuous. Coinciding with Obama’s arrival in Saudi Arabia, Osama Bin Laden released another tape, claiming that Obama had pushed for bombings and fighting in Swat Valley in Pakistan.

Weigh in, opinion leaders. What, if anything, do you think Obama will accomplish in his tour of the Middle East? Do you think there is any hope of continuing the Arab-Israeli peace process? What are your thoughts on the US’s ever-evolving image in the Middle East?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 04, 09 | 9:01 am | Profile

[110] comments (1268 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Mon Jun 01, 2009

GM Files For Bankruptcy

image

General Motors officially filed for bankruptcy today, immediately making the questions of employment, plant closings, and the government’s stake in a restructured G.M., significant concerns for American taxpayers. G.M. currently has $172.8 billion in debts, and the company will face liquidation unless the government subsidizes the sale of G.M. assets and takes a large share of G.M. stocks.

In his speech today, President Obama is expected to lay out a plan for the government to take control of a significant portion of G.M. assets, using $30 billion of taxpayers’ money to help keep the company afloat. The risks of this plan will weigh heavily on the minds of many Americans, but the possible results of a G.M. liquidation—a skyrocketing unemployment rate and an overreaching effect on the economy—poses its own set of disastrous possibilities.
The government is expected to seek a limited role in the process of running a restructured G.M., and would want to sell off its shares as soon as the company can stand on its own feet.

Opinion leaders, weigh in. What do you think of G.M.’s bankruptcy and a possible government restructuring of the fallen auto giant? Do you think Obama’s plan is the best response possible at this point? How do you think G.M.’s bankruptcy should be dealt with?

Posted by: KLC on Jun 01, 09 | 3:46 pm | Profile

[183] comments (1317 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

Wed May 27, 2009

Obama Nominates Sotomayor

image

This Tuesday, President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, to replace Justice David Souter. If Sotomayor is confirmed, she will become the Supreme Court’s first Latina justice.

Born in the south Bronx, Sotomayor has inspired just as much political commentary about the importance of a candidate’s biography in influencing their rulings and future rulings, as the rulings themselves. Known for her exhaustively researched deliberations and slightly left of center rulings, Sotomayor’s controversial decision to uphold New Haven’s right to discard its promotional firefighter test due to its possible effect on minority employment discrimination, has come under particular scrutiny. Several white firefighters who had taken and passed the now defunct test, including one with dyslexia, sued New Haven and the case, Ricci v. DeStefano, is now being heard by the Supreme Court.

Many conservative politicians have already become energized in an attempt to block Sotomayor’s confirmation, implying that her rulings have been motivated by an attempt to advance a liberal agenda. However, with the Democratic Party holding a majority in the Senate and a generally positive opinion of Sotomayor, many feel that her confirmation will be likely.

Sotomayor once said, “whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging." Opinion Leaders, please weigh in, do you think Sotomayor will be confirmed? How do you think Sotomayor’s biography and the effects it has had on her rulings will influence her chances? What do you think of Sotomayor’s past rulings and what do they imply about future rulings she might make?

Posted by: KLC on May 27, 09 | 2:37 pm | Profile

[275] comments (1606 views) |  [0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks
PREV page NEXT page